
Rachelle Allen
Poet Rating
Rank: 24
Short Works Rating
Rank: 20
Novel Rating
Rank: 12
Review Stars
Rank: 47
Why Bother Setting Contest Rules?
The phrase "Oh, that happens constantly" regarding contest winners who didn't follow the guidelines should not be something we nonchalantly accept on this site for writers...and yet it is. Today, though, I've participated long enough in the FS version of The Emperor's New Clothes. I'm going to call out what I actually see regarding not following contest rules yet making it to the Winner's Circle anyway.
And I'm not talking about just the member sponsored ones. The site-sponsored Sonnet contest that just announced its winners has left me simultaneously baffled and aggravated for the same reason: because only one of the four "winners" complied with the formatting of, as was SOOO specifically set forth in the rules, a Shakespearean-style sonnet. To wit:
First quatrain: An exposition of the main theme and main metaphor.
Second quatrain: Theme and metaphor extended or complicated; often, some imaginative example is given.
Third quatrain: Peripeteia (a twist or conflict), often introduced by a "but" (very often leading off the ninth line).
Couplet: Summarizes and leaves the reader with a new, concluding image.
To my fellow Members: I challenge you to read through them all and see what I see. Can you understand my point?
And to our oh-so secret and supposedly knowledgeable Contest Committee Members: Why did you bother going to such lengths and specificity with your rules if you're going to choose "winners" whose pieces didn't even marginally follow them? It's total nonsense.
And for the record, I have no dog in this particular fight. Sonnet-writing is not in my wheelhouse. But I do absolutely love reading them...well, you know, the authentic ones.
RE: Why Bother Setting Contest Rules?
I was in the contest. I am not on the contest committee, nor do I know how many people are on it and vote on these things. I'm gonna back them up on this one. It's a sonnet contest, not a Shakespearean sonnet contest. It happens to use a Shakespearean sonnet as an example. If you read the actual rules as they are written, it doesn't appear that the stuff listed above is part of the rules. It was just a breakdown of a particular sonnet. The actual rules were as follows:
1) It must consist of 14 lines.
2) It must be written in iambic pentameter (duh-DUH-duh-DUH-duh-DUH-duh-DUH-duh-DUH).
3) It must be written in the abab cdcd efef gg rhyme scheme.
Looks like the winning entries followed these patterns, at least more or less. I could nitpick one or two rhymes and iambic adherence in place or two, but they're not trying to flaunt the intent.
I agree there could be better clarity, since the three rules are in bullets (not numbered, as above) and then comments about the form of the argumentation of a sonnet are also in bullets in a list lower down. But these winning sonnets don't suck. In the humble opinion of this ape, there may be bigger hills to die on.

Rachelle Allen
Poet Rating
Rank: 24
Short Works Rating
Rank: 20
Novel Rating
Rank: 12
Review Stars
Rank: 47
RE: Why Bother Setting Contest Rules?
Message edited:
RE: Why Bother Setting Contest Rules?
Message edited:

Rachelle Allen
Poet Rating
Rank: 24
Short Works Rating
Rank: 20
Novel Rating
Rank: 12
Review Stars
Rank: 47
RE: Why Bother Setting Contest Rules?
Message edited:
Laugh Out Loud with a FanStory Author in Print!
Like to laugh? Click here for info. Support a FanStory author in print!
It takes a lot to make me laugh, it takes AI to make me cry


